Wednesday, January 18, 2012

I am here to support Dana Loesch



Full disclosure she is a friend of mine and thou it may seem biased i would support any Conservative being attacked for no reason.


If you haven't heard the news. First off where were you and second dude this is the only site for news. Dana Loesch was being attacked for a statement on her radio show this past week. She said,"given the chance, she would also urinate on the corpses of dead Afghans." If you are a smart person you understand she meant that she would pee on dead terrorists.

Thou she also condemned it first many people have attacked her on her statement. Also  Women, Liberty and America's Future breakfast held by the Illinois Policy Institute decided to dis invite her because of her comment.

This is a joke because she's have been a strong supporter of the military and would not want our troops to do bad things. She is saying thou is that compared to how our troops get treated by the enemy this is harmless. Yet people don't get that this is her right to say it. The first amendment give us the right to free speech. She a political radio talk show host.  She stir the pot to get people talking.


I'll bet you also believed Ann Coulter meant it on the last part when she said "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."  No it's using humor to make a point. Dana pointing out that compared to terrorist we are easier on terrorists then the terrorists are on us.

The hate speech on the left are way more harmful then what my girl d-lo said. From wishing President Bush was dead to asking for the rape of Sarah Palin plus hoping the arabs kill all the jews and put them in the oven. This new tone the left been preaching is only for attacking Right Wingers and their support of the military. I hope that if a lefty said i like to piss on Sarah Palin the left will condemn them as fast as they did Dana but i doubt it.

14 comments:

  1. I've never heard a left-winger wish Bush dead, ask for the rape of anyone let alone Sarah Palin or hope for Arabs to kill all Jews and put them in the oven. Do you have actual sources for these claims or is it just "using humour to make a point"?

    Dana could have perhaps chosen her words more carefully - even if it was an attempt at humour, she has come across as being racist against all Afghans. I'm sure she's not but when your star is on the rise as a pundit, people will pounce.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ^^^ You must not read HuffPo or watch MSNBC.

    ReplyDelete
  3. HuffPo is frequently terrible and I live in the UK so MSNBC is hard to come by. But if you have any examples, please share.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well here the thing the comment were made on radio and other place so i don't where to get them but there are people who track down on these comment like michelle malkin

    ReplyDelete
  5. I see. So there's no written evidence anywhere? Nobody can find a link to a video? Nobody can use Google in an effective manner? Excellent work!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dear "Unknown",

    Of course you haven't "heard" it, because you weren't listening.

    & please please please trot out the old semantical argument that you can't hear text, I'd love to see just how sad your little world actually is:

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0853096/
    http://bit.ly/yGOT8g

    If you need further examples, by all means, pay someone else to do your searching, you lying sack of faeces.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow, stay classy, Terrific Man...

    If the writer of the article makes claims about what left-wing commentators have supposedly written or said, the onus is on them to prove their point.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Good job Nut! You've drawn trolls, you must be doing something right.

    ReplyDelete
  9. dana is so f*cking hot!

    ReplyDelete
  10. And the standard of discussion in here just gets better and better...

    ReplyDelete
  11. 1: Wow. What a poorly written article. I mean that from a technical perspective, of course, though your views are backwards. How many spelling errors, grammatical errors and punctuational errors must one make before they're disallowed the title of "writer"?
    2: As Unknown said (full disclosure: I know who she is, and she's an actual professional journalist) one must source one's claims.
    3: The right to free speech is not the right to avoid consequences of said speech. The breakfast she was disinvited from? They had every right to do it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. 4: What this person said was abhorrent, and in no way is justified by saying that "they" do worse. In addition, the quoted section does not give your justification, nor do you quote her at all after the quote that got her in trouble. For all I know you made up the half-assed justification.
    5: If you think what Coulter said was "funny" or even a joke, you're crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks Ben. I tried to start off a discussion with an even-handed comment. I didn't use foul language or resort to personal attacks.

    But it seems I'm a "lying sack of faeces" and someone else has seen fit to comment on Dana's hotness. She is an attractive woman and there's nothing at all wrong with that, but it's not the pinnacle of all female achievement.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Way to go Brad! Great political insight!

    ReplyDelete